The ethical debate surrounding sex dolls centers on the question: at what point, if any, does a doll transition from inanimate object to person? Currently, sex dolls lack consciousness, feelings, or rights, positioning them firmly as objects. However, as technology advances—particularly with the integration of AI capable of simulating conversation and emotional responses—this line becomes increasingly blurred. Some ethicists argue that once a doll exhibits behaviors resembling consciousness or emotional awareness, ethical considerations about its treatment and rights may become relevant. Others contend that true personhood requires sentience, subjective experience, and self-awareness, which dolls do not possess. This debate raises broader questions about the nature of personhood, the moral status of artificial entities, and our responsibilities toward them. It also touches on societal implications, such as the potential impact on human relationships and social norms. Currently, most legal systems do not recognize dolls as persons, but ongoing developments in AI and robotics could challenge this stance. Ultimately, the ethical threshold for personhood remains complex, requiring careful consideration of technological capabilities, moral principles, and societal values.